Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
11
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 10:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is bullshit thought. If I have decided to train CDO BECAUSE of the dev blog, I am losing that SPs. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
11
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 11:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I don't care if you think I'm whiny or entitled, I'll just be over here being right. lol, the sense of entitlement is strong in this one Padwan I am more than happy to have free SP if they want to refund my whole one week or so of training but seriously I really do not care if they do or not. One week is a lot for new players. I don't get this apologetic mentality of forum dwellers. If CCP said that they will remove all titan skills only to nerf titans so you have to relearn it again, I bet you would ask for more and defend their (stupid) decision. Solution is simple. Refund CDO skills. Or at least for people who started training them after the dev blog. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
12
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 11:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Hasikan Miallok wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I don't care if you think I'm whiny or entitled, I'll just be over here being right. lol, the sense of entitlement is strong in this one Padwan I am more than happy to have free SP if they want to refund my whole one week or so of training but seriously I really do not care if they do or not. One week is a lot for new players. I don't get this apologetic mentality of forum dwellers. If CCP said that they will remove all titan skills only to nerf titans so you have to relearn it again, I bet you would ask for more and defend their (stupid) decision. Solution is simple. Refund CDO skills. Or at least for people who started training them after the dev blog. Its because as a result of the change you are actually getting a week of training for free, you will get 3 skills for either two or one compared to someone who subs after summer. Also SP obsessed players eventually quit so its not a habit to encourage. Note that there is nothing been said either way about SP reimbursement, it may still happen. (The main reason they are WARY of SP reimbursement isprobably that every time they do it, people then whine demanding more for a year or more afterwards). I get free skills sure, but if I did not train CDO because of the dev blog, I would have gotten the same skills AND spend 11 days on something else -> even more skill points... |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
12
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 12:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gavin Dax wrote:Any SP that would be made redundant after the patch changes should be reimbursed.
This is obviously the best thing to do here... I don't really understand the strong push back from Tippia and some others in this thread. Because it's nonsensical to demand a reimbursement for something you gain from. Worst-case scenario, you get 33% more SP in the skills than you had. Apparently, this huge insult requires another 50% of that SP as a GÇ£reimbursementGÇ¥. Of course, a more proper way to describe that is to say you want a bonus on top of your bonus GÇö you are given half a week worth of training, but want to be compensated for this gift by being given another week worth of training. There is nothing to reimburse. Nothing is lost. Nothing is wasted. You got exactly the abilities you trained for. If you tried to speculate on a patch change, you lost. That's part of speculation and it was easily avoidable if you paid any kind of attention, so suck it up and do better next time GÇö it's not CCP's role to make up for your mistakes. Yes there is lost. Nothing was written on dev blog. I am not required to sift thru some forum posts. I am not even required to go to forums. Dev blogs should be sufficient. Stop apologizing to CCP **** ups. They did not mention it, they should refund. I have gained what everyone else will. However, I have lost week of training for skill that bears nothing for me before change and will be lost after change. If the initial dev blog said that SCO/CDO will both be ones used to get new skills and only highest, I would HAVE NOT TRAINED CDO AT ALL. I don't get why you can't see this. 11 days is wasted, in which I could have trained something else AND STILL GET SAME BENEFITS. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
13
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 13:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Xasnevian wrote:I'm glad to see more people posting in this thread! Seems there are more people not completely content with the proposed changes. Of course, Tippia is still here as well: Tippia wrote:Worst-case scenario, you get 33% more SP in the skills than you had. Do you really not see that you yourself (no! don't go looking at other players again, Tippia) don't benefit in any way from these 33% "free SP's"? Tippia wrote:There is nothing to reimburse. Nothing is lost. Nothing is wasted. Time is lost. Time = SP. Please reimburse SP. Tippia wrote:If you tried to speculate on a patch change, you lost. That's part of speculation and it was easily avoidable if you paid any kind of attention, so suck it up and do better next time GÇö it's not CCP's role to make up for your mistakes. As I stated before, I think CCP intents players to "speculate" on the information that is in devblogs. If they did not want this, they would simply release a patch without warning. why can I only like your post once... |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
15
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 18:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:For those of us who don't want to read 11 pages of man children whining at each other, should combat drone op 5 be trained or no? Apparently not. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
16
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 19:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Xasnevian wrote:Tippia, I asked you if you really were not getting this. GǪand as you can se, I am. Just because your nonsensical view isGǪ wellGǪ nonsensical doesn't mean people don't get it or that they're trolling. It just means they don't agree with the nonsense. And yes, trying to claim that getting more is a loss is nothing short of nonsense. Quote:As I stated before; CCP Rise usually puts HUGE WARNING SIGNS around this kind of stuff, so that people know that they are speculating. There were no warning signs and the devblog wasn't adjusted after the forum post. GǪwhich is also very common. Again, just because you jumped on something before the details were out does not mean CCP owes you anything or that they did anything wrong. It means you made an uninformed decision and speculated on a change you didn't fully understand. You end up with less gain than if you had made a sensible decision GÇö that's your problem and not something that needs any kind of fix or compensation. All devblogs are always subject to change up until the minute you see it in a patch note. Dev blogs for changes that are two months out even more so. Jumping on changes the second they are suggested and not waiting a day or two GÇö especially when, again, the change is two months out GÇö is also nonsensical. Even if you make that silly mistake, claiming that it's anyone else's fault that you kept making the mistake even after the information was out is more nonsensical yet. Quote:the fact is that I and many other players trained this skill for nothing. GǪand had you stayed informed; had you had a sensible approach to dev blogs; had you planned ahead, you wouldn't have made that mistake. It's still your mistake though GÇö not something you can blame CCP for. James Amril-Kesh wrote:I'm getting less gain, for having trained more. GǪwhich still means you're not losing anything GÇö not time, not ability, not any mechanics GÇö so no matter how much you twist and turn, there simply is nothing to reimburse. GG 7.43/10 would be trolled again. Now get out. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
17
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 23:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:I guess I'm missing something here. Probably the word GÇ£trainingGÇ¥ in GÇ£training advantageGÇ¥.  To get the same advantages as you have now, people will in the future have to train for longer. Quote:Performance wise they will either remain the same or gain. Yes, but the training required to get that performance will increase, and so will the gaps between the different stages of having the skills trained. Maybe I misunderstood the nature of James' complaint then. I took it to mean that what he was losing was the performance difference he trained for, rather than the training time change. Edit: Actually, he's losing in training advantage as you describe it to anyone who trained SDO V but CDO to anything less than V.
If someone decides to train CDO to V because of dev blog they lost the days they trained it. That is the loss. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 07:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Riyria Twinpeaks wrote:Hasikan Miallok wrote:Of course the SENSIBLE option would have been:
Avionics = SDO current level LDO = SDO current level
MDO = CDO current level
No lost SP, no need for reimbursement.
Then, with SDO trained to V and CDO not trained you would be able to use T2 light and medium drones before the change, but only T2 light and T1 medium after the change. Why do people keep saying that? T2 warrior and T2 valkyrie both only need SDO V not CDO V.... |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 22:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Gavin Dax wrote:lol, no it wasn't. So you're not getting the extra SP everyone else is? How do you know this when the patch isn't even out yet? Have you looked into the patch transition scripts to see that your name is on a list of characters to exclude? You trained for the prerequisite time to collect the 768k SP. For this, you got the expected 768k SP. That SP is being turned into 1024k SP. In other words, the money and time you spent to train that character was turned into exactly the amount of SP you'd expect from that timeframe, and then some. If we just look at CDO V, and the 512k SP collected for it, you're being given 256k SP GÇö 50% GÇö more than you actually trained for. What do YOU not get? If we get 512k reimbursement, then the give out would be equal. SDO V guys earn 512k+256k skill points after change. People with CDO V and SDO V get only 256k skill points. Does that seem fair to you? No. It shouldnt. That's why you refund 512k and both parties have gained 256k+512k skill points total. Everyone is happy. Except you I guess? |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 05:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
I have decided to hide tippias posts. She is just trolling, thats all. Or I hope at least. No one sane would suggest that someone gaining 768k skillpoints while someone else is gaining only 256k skillpoints is in any way fair. And we are talking about current players, not some future players or some **** like that . |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 05:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Your loss. I don't always agree with Tippia but he's not a troll. Well if she isn't then it really means she (he?) is really that dumb. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 06:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Well, to be fair, now and then Tippia is a troll. Now is not one of those times however, if Tippia & I aren't ripping into each other but agreeing, it's normally a pretty strong sign some other people are lacking common sense.
To lay it out yet again. Current skills. SDO: Drone Range + Light & Medium T2 Drones CDO: Light & Medium Drone Damage.
Post Change Skills. DA: Drone Range LDO: Light Drone Damage + Light T2 Drones. MDO: Medium Drone Damage + Medium T2 Drones.
So, someone with SDO V has access to T2 drones currently. Post patch day they should still have access to T2 drones so they need LDO & MDO at V in order to gain that. Someone with SDO V has drone range, so they need DA V to gain that. Someone with CDO V has Damage so they need LDO & MDO V to gain that.
This means is you have only SDO V you get a bit more damage from skills as a by-product. This means if you have only CDO V you gain access to T2 drones as a by product. If you have both, you are right where you are now. But CCP's choice here is to not remove the ability to do what you can currently.
As to why the SP is irrelevant. If they suddenly change a skill from *1 multi to *10 multi, should you have to train another 30 days to be where you were before they changed? The answer is no. SP doesn't have a 'value'. SP gets you skills which have abilities which have values. So the value is on the ability, not the SP to get there. The SP to get there provides some judgement between ability values, but the abilities are the important part. Meaning it's irrelevant how many extra sp someone else gains or even you gain. What is relevant is if you agree with the basic philosophy that a skill change should never make you loose abilities.
TLDR. CCP is preserving current abilities, this has a small side effect in edge cases & deliberately gamed cases of giving a minor new ability in order to avoid removing abilities. If you disagree, convince CCP the entire design philosophy is wrong, don't argue on 'SP bonus isn't fair'. If CCP did the change without telling anyone then I would argue it's just edge case. But I guarantee you a LOT of people trained CDO just because dev blog said so. So no, it's not an "edge" case. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 06:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Walter Hart White wrote: If CCP did the change without telling anyone then I would argue it's just edge case. But I guarantee you a LOT of people trained CDO just because dev blog said so. So no, it's not an "edge" case.
Anyone who trained it in the tiny window between the initial post and post 630 has had months of value from their drones doing more damage. So has gotten value for it. Anyone who trained it after that failed to both read the posts, & understand the meaning of a Dev blog as a proposed change taking final feedback. Till it's in patch notes, it's not 100% final. And failed to do homework properly while attempting to speculate on maximising their SP, and they still make an SP profit. In none of these cases do they need any additional compensation. We are not required to read "forums" to get updates. If there was an update just 2 days from initial dev blog, why not change the dev blog? And a lot of folks trained CDO without even needing it. Mostly because you might need it in future and if you trianed it now you would not need to train two skill sets in the future. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 09:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Medalyn Isis wrote:It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.
To me I would summarise it like this -
Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.
Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)
Both points of view are quite valid. Yes, but I don't see why Side B could not give Side A what it wants, ie refund. Side B loses nothing over that... |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 09:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mocam wrote:Medalyn Isis wrote:It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.
To me I would summarise it like this -
Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.
Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)
Both points of view are quite valid. I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others). You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play. The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around. So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern. Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it? |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 10:27:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mocam wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Mocam wrote:Medalyn Isis wrote:It is disappointing that member of our hallowed community cannot seemingly understand, or are unwilling too, each others points of view.
To me I would summarise it like this -
Side A - The skill transition is unfair because the advantage which I spent time skill training for is now being given to others.
Side B - The skill transition is fair because we are getting more free SP and keeping all our previous abilities to use things which we trained to use before (except for the DLA II in edge cases)
Both points of view are quite valid. I'd be in the Side B area - with our without "free SP". The SP means nothing to me and probably anyone who trained the skills up - newer or not (beyond some envy on gains by others). You train skills to enable styles of play. They are changing around the skills but these changes will not impact your ability with those styles of play. The fact some may gain or not gain SP is fairly meaningless vs your abilities to use the tools you had trained for when you are *NOT* losing those abilities - simply shuffling them around. So some gain more than others? Sorry but that shouldn't be a major concern. Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it? Umm... That's what I'm saying - I don't care if we get free SP but I do find it fair. Side A finds it unfair. Side B finds it fair due to SP gains. I mean from refund. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 11:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Walter Hart White wrote: Then why do you care if someone gets free SPs? This is why we can't have nice things. Side A wants refund, so why side B is so much against it?
Because side A is demanding they get more advantage over someone who hasn't trained any of the skills yet simply because they feel they deserve a larger number. Not because they loose any abilities or anything like that. Remember there is side C. The group who haven't trained drones and will be behind regardless. Side A already is getting more sp for their time. They just want to take their bonus sp they are already getting and make it an even bigger number that they can allocate to any skill for an even larger time advantage. But side B is getting the most of the SPs and yet the bicker at Side A because they want the same amount as Side B? |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 11:52:00 -
[19] - Quote
Best solution is refunding CDO for everyone. Side A will stop bickering, Side B will have nothing to bicker about or to bicker with and everyone wins. Characters who have CDO V lose nothing in terms of progression and can spend the 11 days they had to spend on CDO (many of them after reading blog) back. Literary everyone wins in this situation. You can't argue that! |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 12:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:Best solution is refunding CDO for everyone. Side A will stop bickering, Side B will have nothing to bicker about or to bicker with and everyone wins. Characters who have CDO V lose nothing in terms of progression and can spend the 11 days they had to spend on CDO (many of them after reading blog) back. Literary everyone wins in this situation. You can't argue that! Except for the fact that is what side A is asking for effectively by demanding they get free SP equivalent to CDO V...... Just prettied up in a dress and make up. So.... No. Except some people from side A trained CDO only because it was to be split into LDO and MDO. Thus their 512k SPs are wasted. If they sticked with SDO only they would practically invest 512k SPs somewhere else == situation is same as with refund. |

Walter Hart White
Heisenberg Minings
29
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 15:14:00 -
[21] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:Since we're all insisting on everything being fair, can I ask that CCP refund my character a sum of ISK equal to the differential clone cost for having more SP than I did before simply with Scout Drone Operation V? I don't find this character really using medium drones and don't feel like it's fair for me to pay extra to upgrade my clone each time for SPs I didn't ask for.
I would like this ISK refund to factor in the total unnecessary costs I will incur over this pilot's lifetime. If you hate free SPs, you can always pod yourself in alpha clone. |
|
|